Comment 16 for bug 546649

Revision history for this message
Michael Casadevall (mcasadevall) wrote :

Speed seems extremely good with test kernel to the point that NFS root gets acceptable performance (I've tried it before and never had usable performance out of it).

I ran bonnie++ as a stress test over NFS, no errors in dmesg that I can see:

mcasadevall@dusk:~$ bonnie++
Writing a byte at a time...done
Writing intelligently...done
Rewriting...done
Reading a byte at a time...done
Reading intelligently...done
start 'em...done...done...done...done...done...
Create files in sequential order...done.
Stat files in sequential order...done.
Delete files in sequential order...done.
Create files in random order...done.
Stat files in random order...done.
Delete files in random order...done.
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
dusk 1G 215 97 7584 5 5137 8 574 100 11709 8 564.4 63
Latency 40163us 8138ms 7328ms 41249us 310ms 153ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
dusk -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
                 16 293 18 1469 33 492 37 270 19 2211 10 397 30
Latency 407ms 109ms 90387us 80360us 2311us 255ms
1.96,1.96,dusk,1,1270685767,1G,,215,97,7584,5,5137,8,574,100,11709,8,564.4,63,16,,,,,293,18,1469,33,492,37,270,19,2211,10,397,30,40163us,8138ms,7328ms,41249us,310ms,153ms,407ms,109ms,90387us,80360us,2311us,255ms